Workforce Aggression
Why might Smith be exhibiting aggressive behaviors towards her subordinates and other managers
Aggression in the workforce has been identified as counterproductive work behavior which is defined as voluntary behavior that violates significant organizational norms and in so doing, threatens the well-being of the organization, its members, or both (cited in Landy Conte, p. 186). The manifestation of this behavior really affects the organization directly and indirectly considering that the behavior attacks the organization and the members of the organization. Landy and Conte noted that harassment, gossip, verbal abuse, and fighting (p. 187) are some of the manifestations of counterproductive behavior directed against interpersonal deviance.
Obviously, Smiths aggression exerted against other people in the organization is for the personal reason and interest. Considering the details provided in the case, Smith would favor a person whom she can relate with such as her favorite nursing assistant who is also a single mom like her at the same time, she harasses employees who are recognized by the company as highly competent and effective like that of Peters. Lardy and Conte, identified that Smiths behavior in particular is classified as sabotage in which it has the intention to damage, disrupt, or subvert the organizations operations for personal purposes of the saboteur by creating unfavorable publicity, damage to property, destruction of working relationships, or harming or employees or customers (Crino, 1994, cited in Lardy and Conte, p. 187).
Similarly, Smiths counterproductive behavior is triggered by certain stimuli in the workplace. In particular, employees evaluation is very tight that seems difficult for her to beat because of financial mismanagement that goes on with the company, which she has direct involvement. The evaluation focuses on task performance in fifteen items that includes obedience to supervisory directives, and many others. Secondly, working in Cedar District Hospital may seem unchallenging that causes her job dissatisfaction. It is noted that Smith stays on that small hospital simply to gain work experience. Third, the continuing layoff in the hospital gives her the feeling of discomfort and instability. These conditions create in her a very strong emotion to carry out an action.
According to a theory that acknowledges the role of emotion in the persistency of behavior which is known as Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion, the purpose of emotion is adaptation, and that emotions are activated in an individual when issues of survival are raised in fact or by implication (Hartel, Zerbe, Ashkanasy, p. 70). This theory clearly explains that Smith commits aggression against co-employees because she sees Peters and her other subordinates as threat to her existence as a CFO considering the differing result of their work performance. Her status as having two illegitimate children is also a disadvantage on her career because of moral issue. Indeed, Smiths aggression is motivated by a strong emotion that points directly to her feeling of insecurity and dissatisfaction.
In addition, this practice becomes a habit since Smith has already developed the habit of criticizing other employees. It stated that Smith did not hesitate to criticize those who were overweight which indicates her ignorance of others feeling. Smiths behavior towards her officemates may also be analyzed in light with the social bonding theory in four different dimensions as attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief (p. 158). Accordingly, Anderson explained that deviant behavior may be due to her closeness to the person as her subordinates, or the risk of engaging in the counterproductive behavior, she is not busy, or she may be ignorant of her own action (p. 158).
What effects might Smiths behavior have on the workplace and, possibly, the organization
Consistent attack on a person results to emotional stresses that prevent him or her to perform hisher work as effective as he does before because he is fully governed by negative emotions. At the onset, Peters response to the bullying affects her disposition there is a sudden change in her attitude towards the situation but not towards other people in the company. Spector, Fox, and Domagalski (2005) understand the role of emotion in the responses made by the individual who receive bullying. To explicate this, they developed a model which explains the effect of deviant behavior to non-deviant. First, those who perceive the behavior as stressful develop negative emotions such as anger, anxiety, and depression (p. 31), that motivates them to either retaliate or acquire CWB or counterproductive behavior later on in life.
Fox and Spector mentioned Retaliation theory as one of the effects of CWB that pertains to reactions to the injustice because of the negative reactions that are developed such as helplessness, learned helplessness or substance abuse, anger, and even aggression, revenge or sabotage (p. 32). Spector, et.al emphasized the role of emotion in the emotional responses of a person to stressor as in the case of Peters. Peters as a response begins to experience emotional stress as quoted, it didnt make her feel any better. She is very worried for the outcome of her decision and indecisive for what actions to take.
Moreover, the emotional state of a person that is developed as a result of counterproductive behavior could also affect organization in such a way that employees may acquire high levels of job tension, somatic tension, fatigue and burnout (Spector, et.al., p. 33). In a meta-analysis made, Spector identified behavioral outcomes as a result of employees frustration as job satisfaction, work anxiety, physical health symptoms, employee withdrawal behavior, aggression, hostility, and sabotage (Spector, et.al, p. 34). Similarly, the deviant behavior would also affect other people who have personally experienced the sabotage or have witnessed the situation. As a result, employees will contradict or disobey policies related to CWB if those policies are not enforced properly (Giacalone, p. 177). Landy and Conte on the other hand, argued that deviant behavior will even endanger the well-being of the organization, its members, or both (p. 183) because of the presence of gossip.
Though bullying and other forms of deviant behavior are exhibited by many successful bosses because they are able to get the best result they want from their employees, still it produces many other administrative problems such as the employee turnover, absenteeism, and sometimes legal issues that may put the company at risk.
Are Peters concerns about repercussions valid Why
Peters concerns about the repercussions are not valid however, her responses to Smiths statements are normal because she occupies a subordinate position, and she understands that her boss remarks or evaluation could affect her good standing in the company. What happened to Peters is that she lost her ability to understand the situation and to reason out clearly. This condition may happen naturally to a person who becomes a victim of sabotage like her other co-employees. Zerbe, Hartel, and Ashkanasy wrote, One unexplored variable with the potential to impact ethical behavior and decision-making is emotional intelligence (p. 226). On the other hand, her reactions may be due to her being too conscientious. Barling and Cooper quoted, job stressors have a greater impact on counterproductive behavior when individuals are high in negative affectivity (p. 145). Thus, Peters ability to weigh or accept criticism is based on her personality and own perception of the situation.
Similarly, her repercussions cannot validate her explanation because she is governed by fear. Fear is considered a negative emotion and because of that, it will subjugate her self-perception until she gets lost to her track. Thus, Peters fails to use her reasoning ability in analyzing the real situation and see the whole thing in a wider perspective because of the presence of fear and worry.
Peters is only a subordinate and it is difficult for her to counteract any misconduct her superior is done on her or to call the attention of the administration regarding the problem through submitting a letter. She might as well settle things to herself and take things constructively which means, she will not allow those feedback to interfere with her work rather, see the criticism on its positive side by learning from it and by accepting that she is responsible for her own behavior. If she will approach the problem this way, she will also learn to ignore the criticism, deny the criticism if it is not true, or blame others for possessing counterproductive behavior if that severely affect her. This reaction would definitely keep her away from having trouble with Smith, as she might think.
What is important in this approach is that, it hinders the development of depressing emotions that may affect her work attitude.
Given the two options (counteract what her boss has done and inform the administration about Smith misbehavior) her standing as trusted and competent worker may place her in a difficult situation because the company values employees who are obedient. On the other hand, the constructive approach will help her realize many underlying factors of the situation but may lose the opportunity to resolve the problem that may continue to put the company at risk in the future.
If you were called in to investigate this situation and make recommendations to the CEO, what would you do
In case the administration has learned about the sabotage and Peters is tasked to do investigation and make recommendations about the problem, as a person of credibility, he has already the right to find out the truth without hesitation. By means of this, she can explore all the possibilities regarding the truthfulness of the issue.
Thus, the investigation can be done through a research study focusing on one type of behavior the researcher will conceptualize the questions in the questionnaire that seek to discover ones real personality or to utilize a ready-made Psychological Test. Research study I think is highly important to resolve the issue because the process of research writing requires balance and careful analysis of data. Another way is to use a Psychological Test applicable to such problem. The recommendations that will be made at the last part of the paper are based on the findings of the study. Here, the researcher will gather information relating to personality traits with attempts to manifest counterproductive behavior, or the act of counterproductive behavior has been done.
A group of employees who are randomly selected will be requested to answer the Psychological Test on one afternoon. After the data are gathered, tabulated and treated using statistical tools, the results will be interpreted to answer the questions posted in the objective of the study. In the end, the data gathered with its conclusion, will be used in providing recommendations to the problem.
One good aspect of research study as a means of finding solution to a problem is that, the problem is treated in a very objective way. It avoids finger pointing on one person rather, it helps presents other factors underlying for the manifestation of such behavior. Research writing provides ground where and what to start when it comes to dealing with the problem. Third, the person who is identified possessing the unwanted behavior will not have any excuse or reason to refute the result. It is now a powerful basis that the company will use for the next move that it will do for this purpose.
Finally, what overall recommendations would you make to the CEO and Board of Directors
At this point in time, there are many approaches that I must recommend being a person entrusted of this problem.
First is to develop a corporate culture that the management desires for the company because it is useful in realigning the principles of the company that will be carefully observed through the policies that will be made afterwards.
Secondly, the company must identify any form of counterproductive behavior common among the employees and make them responsible for it in the light of policies that have been developed to resolve the issue. Start dealing with each problem through counseling session with the Human Resource Department.
Third, develop teamwork among groups in the hospital instead of individualism. People are expected to be more productive when they discover their worth, and working in a team makes a person highly fulfilled because they discover what they can contribute to the groups efforts through which a person realizes his worth and heighten job satisfaction.
Fourth, the company must enhance its Human Resource Departments program and policies. One good recommendation to avoid having new employees who have psychological problem is through giving each applicant psychological test. Once proven guilty of possessing negative emotional behavior, applicant should not be accepted despite his or her achievements.
Last, the company has to draft policies that will deal with different kinds of counterproductive behavior in pursuant of the corporate values. By means of that, the company can prevent the likelihood of the existence of any counterproductive behavior.
These may not be effective methods but continuous involvement and dealing with the problem makes the company grow mature gradually in resolving issues related to this one.
Aggression in the workforce has been identified as counterproductive work behavior which is defined as voluntary behavior that violates significant organizational norms and in so doing, threatens the well-being of the organization, its members, or both (cited in Landy Conte, p. 186). The manifestation of this behavior really affects the organization directly and indirectly considering that the behavior attacks the organization and the members of the organization. Landy and Conte noted that harassment, gossip, verbal abuse, and fighting (p. 187) are some of the manifestations of counterproductive behavior directed against interpersonal deviance.
Obviously, Smiths aggression exerted against other people in the organization is for the personal reason and interest. Considering the details provided in the case, Smith would favor a person whom she can relate with such as her favorite nursing assistant who is also a single mom like her at the same time, she harasses employees who are recognized by the company as highly competent and effective like that of Peters. Lardy and Conte, identified that Smiths behavior in particular is classified as sabotage in which it has the intention to damage, disrupt, or subvert the organizations operations for personal purposes of the saboteur by creating unfavorable publicity, damage to property, destruction of working relationships, or harming or employees or customers (Crino, 1994, cited in Lardy and Conte, p. 187).
Similarly, Smiths counterproductive behavior is triggered by certain stimuli in the workplace. In particular, employees evaluation is very tight that seems difficult for her to beat because of financial mismanagement that goes on with the company, which she has direct involvement. The evaluation focuses on task performance in fifteen items that includes obedience to supervisory directives, and many others. Secondly, working in Cedar District Hospital may seem unchallenging that causes her job dissatisfaction. It is noted that Smith stays on that small hospital simply to gain work experience. Third, the continuing layoff in the hospital gives her the feeling of discomfort and instability. These conditions create in her a very strong emotion to carry out an action.
According to a theory that acknowledges the role of emotion in the persistency of behavior which is known as Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion, the purpose of emotion is adaptation, and that emotions are activated in an individual when issues of survival are raised in fact or by implication (Hartel, Zerbe, Ashkanasy, p. 70). This theory clearly explains that Smith commits aggression against co-employees because she sees Peters and her other subordinates as threat to her existence as a CFO considering the differing result of their work performance. Her status as having two illegitimate children is also a disadvantage on her career because of moral issue. Indeed, Smiths aggression is motivated by a strong emotion that points directly to her feeling of insecurity and dissatisfaction.
In addition, this practice becomes a habit since Smith has already developed the habit of criticizing other employees. It stated that Smith did not hesitate to criticize those who were overweight which indicates her ignorance of others feeling. Smiths behavior towards her officemates may also be analyzed in light with the social bonding theory in four different dimensions as attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief (p. 158). Accordingly, Anderson explained that deviant behavior may be due to her closeness to the person as her subordinates, or the risk of engaging in the counterproductive behavior, she is not busy, or she may be ignorant of her own action (p. 158).
What effects might Smiths behavior have on the workplace and, possibly, the organization
Consistent attack on a person results to emotional stresses that prevent him or her to perform hisher work as effective as he does before because he is fully governed by negative emotions. At the onset, Peters response to the bullying affects her disposition there is a sudden change in her attitude towards the situation but not towards other people in the company. Spector, Fox, and Domagalski (2005) understand the role of emotion in the responses made by the individual who receive bullying. To explicate this, they developed a model which explains the effect of deviant behavior to non-deviant. First, those who perceive the behavior as stressful develop negative emotions such as anger, anxiety, and depression (p. 31), that motivates them to either retaliate or acquire CWB or counterproductive behavior later on in life.
Fox and Spector mentioned Retaliation theory as one of the effects of CWB that pertains to reactions to the injustice because of the negative reactions that are developed such as helplessness, learned helplessness or substance abuse, anger, and even aggression, revenge or sabotage (p. 32). Spector, et.al emphasized the role of emotion in the emotional responses of a person to stressor as in the case of Peters. Peters as a response begins to experience emotional stress as quoted, it didnt make her feel any better. She is very worried for the outcome of her decision and indecisive for what actions to take.
Moreover, the emotional state of a person that is developed as a result of counterproductive behavior could also affect organization in such a way that employees may acquire high levels of job tension, somatic tension, fatigue and burnout (Spector, et.al., p. 33). In a meta-analysis made, Spector identified behavioral outcomes as a result of employees frustration as job satisfaction, work anxiety, physical health symptoms, employee withdrawal behavior, aggression, hostility, and sabotage (Spector, et.al, p. 34). Similarly, the deviant behavior would also affect other people who have personally experienced the sabotage or have witnessed the situation. As a result, employees will contradict or disobey policies related to CWB if those policies are not enforced properly (Giacalone, p. 177). Landy and Conte on the other hand, argued that deviant behavior will even endanger the well-being of the organization, its members, or both (p. 183) because of the presence of gossip.
Though bullying and other forms of deviant behavior are exhibited by many successful bosses because they are able to get the best result they want from their employees, still it produces many other administrative problems such as the employee turnover, absenteeism, and sometimes legal issues that may put the company at risk.
Are Peters concerns about repercussions valid Why
Peters concerns about the repercussions are not valid however, her responses to Smiths statements are normal because she occupies a subordinate position, and she understands that her boss remarks or evaluation could affect her good standing in the company. What happened to Peters is that she lost her ability to understand the situation and to reason out clearly. This condition may happen naturally to a person who becomes a victim of sabotage like her other co-employees. Zerbe, Hartel, and Ashkanasy wrote, One unexplored variable with the potential to impact ethical behavior and decision-making is emotional intelligence (p. 226). On the other hand, her reactions may be due to her being too conscientious. Barling and Cooper quoted, job stressors have a greater impact on counterproductive behavior when individuals are high in negative affectivity (p. 145). Thus, Peters ability to weigh or accept criticism is based on her personality and own perception of the situation.
Similarly, her repercussions cannot validate her explanation because she is governed by fear. Fear is considered a negative emotion and because of that, it will subjugate her self-perception until she gets lost to her track. Thus, Peters fails to use her reasoning ability in analyzing the real situation and see the whole thing in a wider perspective because of the presence of fear and worry.
Peters is only a subordinate and it is difficult for her to counteract any misconduct her superior is done on her or to call the attention of the administration regarding the problem through submitting a letter. She might as well settle things to herself and take things constructively which means, she will not allow those feedback to interfere with her work rather, see the criticism on its positive side by learning from it and by accepting that she is responsible for her own behavior. If she will approach the problem this way, she will also learn to ignore the criticism, deny the criticism if it is not true, or blame others for possessing counterproductive behavior if that severely affect her. This reaction would definitely keep her away from having trouble with Smith, as she might think.
What is important in this approach is that, it hinders the development of depressing emotions that may affect her work attitude.
Given the two options (counteract what her boss has done and inform the administration about Smith misbehavior) her standing as trusted and competent worker may place her in a difficult situation because the company values employees who are obedient. On the other hand, the constructive approach will help her realize many underlying factors of the situation but may lose the opportunity to resolve the problem that may continue to put the company at risk in the future.
If you were called in to investigate this situation and make recommendations to the CEO, what would you do
In case the administration has learned about the sabotage and Peters is tasked to do investigation and make recommendations about the problem, as a person of credibility, he has already the right to find out the truth without hesitation. By means of this, she can explore all the possibilities regarding the truthfulness of the issue.
Thus, the investigation can be done through a research study focusing on one type of behavior the researcher will conceptualize the questions in the questionnaire that seek to discover ones real personality or to utilize a ready-made Psychological Test. Research study I think is highly important to resolve the issue because the process of research writing requires balance and careful analysis of data. Another way is to use a Psychological Test applicable to such problem. The recommendations that will be made at the last part of the paper are based on the findings of the study. Here, the researcher will gather information relating to personality traits with attempts to manifest counterproductive behavior, or the act of counterproductive behavior has been done.
A group of employees who are randomly selected will be requested to answer the Psychological Test on one afternoon. After the data are gathered, tabulated and treated using statistical tools, the results will be interpreted to answer the questions posted in the objective of the study. In the end, the data gathered with its conclusion, will be used in providing recommendations to the problem.
One good aspect of research study as a means of finding solution to a problem is that, the problem is treated in a very objective way. It avoids finger pointing on one person rather, it helps presents other factors underlying for the manifestation of such behavior. Research writing provides ground where and what to start when it comes to dealing with the problem. Third, the person who is identified possessing the unwanted behavior will not have any excuse or reason to refute the result. It is now a powerful basis that the company will use for the next move that it will do for this purpose.
Finally, what overall recommendations would you make to the CEO and Board of Directors
At this point in time, there are many approaches that I must recommend being a person entrusted of this problem.
First is to develop a corporate culture that the management desires for the company because it is useful in realigning the principles of the company that will be carefully observed through the policies that will be made afterwards.
Secondly, the company must identify any form of counterproductive behavior common among the employees and make them responsible for it in the light of policies that have been developed to resolve the issue. Start dealing with each problem through counseling session with the Human Resource Department.
Third, develop teamwork among groups in the hospital instead of individualism. People are expected to be more productive when they discover their worth, and working in a team makes a person highly fulfilled because they discover what they can contribute to the groups efforts through which a person realizes his worth and heighten job satisfaction.
Fourth, the company must enhance its Human Resource Departments program and policies. One good recommendation to avoid having new employees who have psychological problem is through giving each applicant psychological test. Once proven guilty of possessing negative emotional behavior, applicant should not be accepted despite his or her achievements.
Last, the company has to draft policies that will deal with different kinds of counterproductive behavior in pursuant of the corporate values. By means of that, the company can prevent the likelihood of the existence of any counterproductive behavior.
These may not be effective methods but continuous involvement and dealing with the problem makes the company grow mature gradually in resolving issues related to this one.